In a recent address at the Courts and the Constitution Conference, Justice BV Nagarathna of the Supreme Court of India highlighted crucial issues concerning gubernatorial overreach and her dissenting stance on the controversial demonetization move. Expressing concern over governors sitting indefinitely on bills passed by elected legislatures, she emphasized the importance of governors discharging their duties in accordance with the Constitution to reduce unnecessary litigation. Justice Nagarathna’s remarks came in the wake of growing scrutiny over the conduct of governors, as seen in the recent case involving Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s refusal to reinduct a minister into the state cabinet.Delving into her dissent on demonetization, Justice Nagarathna explained her apprehension towards the government’s decision in 2016. She highlighted the disproportionate return of demonetized currency notes, indicating a potential loophole for converting black money into white. Her dissent stemmed from concerns about the impact on the common man, as the majority of demonetized currency returned to banks, possibly legitimizing unaccounted cash. The judge’s candid reflections shed light on the complexities and consequences of significant policy decisions, resonating with the public’s interest and raising important questions about governance and accountability.
